A study by Mohammad Hasan Algarhy proposes that the universe originated from a
reverse mechanism of the Big Freeze, beginning as a tiny collective quantum
wave, the 'Identity Stem Wave of the Universe' (ISWU). This wave accumulated
energy, forming identity stem waves of matter, eventually leading to a super
symmetrical crystal structure. The study introduces the concept of "The
Big Defreeze," wherein the universe emerged from a frozen state at nearly
absolute zero temperature. Additionally, the research explores three new
fundamental forces, termed "The Complex Forces," which could explain
universal expansion and symmetry-breaking mechanisms. The study also suggests a
methodology using Bose-Einstein Condensates (BEC) to test the proposed
framework, offering new insights into cosmology and quantum mechanics.
This study proposes an addition to Schrödinger's equation by introducing the 'IN sign,' enabling the energy operator and wave function to interact dynamically and swap roles. This modification allows the energy operator to act within a field of waves and incorporates additional quantum states. The 'IN sign' is a step toward understanding wave function evolution across multiple variables, offering potential applications in quantum mechanics and topological studies.
Purpose:
This research aims to enhance Schrödinger's equation by integrating the 'IN sign,' allowing dynamic interaction between the energy operator and the wave function while extending its application to complex potentials and topological frameworks.
Significance:
The proposed modification has profound implications in quantum mechanics, enabling more comprehensive modeling of wave functions and their interactions across multidimensional systems.
The President of the United States wakes up one day and says
“Hey guys, you know what, we got it wrong, enough violence, blood, and wars
around the world. Only animals kill each
other, we are supposed to be smart creatures, and we should find smarter, and
peaceful solutions for our conflicts.
I am gonna stop all funding for the military, and I am gonna
allocate it to healthcare, education, and scientific research. I am gonna shut
down the military-industrial complex, and I am gonna turn the arms factories
into hospitals, schools, and research centers.
What would be the reaction of the American people, the
American army, and the military-industrial complex? What we the reaction of the
world?
Well, something similar happened 3,400 years ago in Egypt,
the greatest kingdom on earth back then. An era when the Egyptian Empire was at
one of the peaks of its power with strong control over wider geographical
territories east, west, and south.
In the 18th dynasty about 1,351 BC. Akhenaten, a
famous ancient Egyptian king who was the tenth ruler of the eighteenth dynasty
decided after a few years of his inauguration to seek global peace globally,
and stop war and violence in the whole world.
Akhenaten had a significantly progressive, and humane vision
for achieving global peace and non-violence, even to date after about 3,400
years we are not able to acknowledge this vision and effectively work towards
global peace. The significance of his vision was that it did not come from
peace activists or organizations. It came from the king of the strongest empire
on Earth who had the most powerful military. A case that has not been heard of
in human history.
Yet, it seems that neither humanity, nor his military, nor
his enemies were ready for such a progressive vision for global peace and
non-violence.
The Amarna letters sometimes referred to as the Amarna
correspondence or Amarna tablets, are an archive, consisting of diplomatic
correspondence between the Egyptian administration and its representatives in
Canaan and Amurru, or neighboring kingdom leaders, during the New Kingdom,
spanning a period between c. 1360–1332 BC. The letters were found in Upper
Egypt at el-Amarna, the modern name for the ancient Egyptian capital of Akhet
Aten, founded by the ancient Egyptian king Akhenaten who moved the capital of
Egypt to Akhet Aten.
Most of the letters are in a variety of Akkadian and,
Canaanite-Akkadian. In some letters, we see some of the city-state rulers (who
could be considered as governors) in Canaan and West Asia in some of the
territories that were under Egyptian control back then seeking military support
and help from Akhenaten against their enemies, and highlighting that they are
losing lands and this is a great threat to Egypt. It seems like Akhenaten was
sticking to his peaceful vision, and it seems that he did not even respond to
them, he was seriously done with war, blood, and violence, but his enemies were
not, which created a huge threat to Egypt, and did lead to disastrous
consequences on the Egyptian empire back then losing its power and control, and
losing lands as well. Definitely the Egyptians in general, and the Egyptian
military specifically were not happy with what was happening leading to what
could be considered a military coup with Noble intentions, until Horemheb took
control. Horemheb was the commander-in-chief of the army under the reign of
Tutankhamun (The successor of Akhenaten).
In a sense, this did save the ancient Egyptian empire
leading to the 19th dynasty, and another powerful and prosperous era
in ancient Egypt.
Akhenaten`s vision for global peace and non-violence was
progressive and noble. Yet, at that time it seems that it was not practical, It
seems as well that his approach to achieving his vision was not very
successful. He decided to action his vision on his own without support neither
from the Egyptians nor his military or his allies. Akhenaten did not try to
gradually take this shift from a world dominated by violence, and military
control to global peace and non-violence. Instead, he decided to take an instant,
sort of shocking approach that simply would have never worked.
His approach to achieving his vision for global peace and
non-violence was not the only challenge. He is perhaps best known for his
religious reforms, particularly his attempt to establish monotheism as some
scholars claim. Akhenaten's reign marked a significant departure from
traditional Egyptian religious practices, which typically involved the worship
of numerous deities. He promoted Aten as the sole deity, often depicted as a
sun disk with rays ending in hands offering life. This religious shift led to the
construction of the new capital city called Akhetaten dedicated to the worship
of Aten. Some scholars do debate that he was not actually promoting monotheism
and that it was simply a doctrine of ancient Egyptian beliefs.
Anyways, his religious reforms were not universally
accepted, and his reign was marked by political and social upheaval. After his
death, his successors, reversed many of his reforms, restoring the old
religious practices and abandoning Akhetaten. Some of Akhenaten`s successors
including Horemheb destroyed many of his artifacts, and archeological evidence
of his legacy, they basically tried to delete him and his legacy from
historical records.
His religious reforms were accompanied by changes in art and
culture, notably the introduction of a more naturalistic artistic style, and
for the first time the introduction of the humane side of the ancient Egyptian
kings, with several depictions of Akhenaten having quality time with his
family, his wife, and daughters. Ancient Egyptian kings, ' art and inscriptions
before Akhenaten used to focus on depicting their military victories, and their
legacies.
Despite the short-lived nature of Akhenaten's peaceful,
non-violent religious revolution, Akhenaten remains a figure of fascination and
debate among historians, Egyptologists, and scholars interested in ancient
culture and religion. His reign continues to be studied for its unique
contributions to Egyptian history and its impact on subsequent generations.
Would Akhenaten`s progressive vision for global peace and
non-violence be achieved at some point in the future? Hopefully, it will not
take humanity another 3,400 years to realize that we should end war, and
violence and resolve our conflicts in a much smarter, and more peaceful way.
·King Phao Ra was a West Asian
who controlled a part of Northern Egypt in the Delta region toward the end of
the Fourteenth Dynasty (c.
1725 – 1650 BC). He is likely to be the biblical pharaoh.
·King Phao Ra was from the same political alliance of
the West Asians who immigrated to Ancient Egypt in huge groups. This political
alliance included the Canaanites. The Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) were likely
one group or tribe of those Canaanites.
·Political tension arose between King Phao Ra and his
old allies mainly the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael), and he started a campaign of
oppression against them.
·A man named Mose/Msw/Messu started a new movement
preaching ideological teachings challenging King Phao Ra. Several groups (not
limited to the Israelites) followed him. The Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) found a
great opportunity in him to gain some political strength against King Phao Ra.
·The Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) together with the other
groups following Mose/Msw/Messu did achieve victories against King Phao Ra
under Mose`s leadership, who then managed a part of Ancient Egypt and reigned
for a short time about seven years (c. 1588-1582 BC).
·During that time c.1550 BC
another West Asian alliance (The Hyksos) controlled wider parts of Ancient
Egypt. Dedu Mose tried to sue them for peace and might have succeeded in living
in peace simultaneously with them for some time.
·A few years later came the
native Ancient Egyptian King Ahmose I who was the founder of the Eighteenth
Dynasty (c. 1550-1292 BC) and completed the conquest and expulsion of the
Hyksos from the Nile Delta.
·It became a priority for the
eighteenth, nineteenth, and later dynasties to face the threat of the West
Asian groups and prevent them from controlling any parts of Ancient Egypt
again.
·Then came King Ramesses II who reigned (c. 1303 BC –
1213 BC), and whose name is Ra Mose II and not Ramesses II. He decided to expel
any foreign threats from Egypt. His campaign was not specifically on the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael), it
was against any foreign threat on Egyptian soil in general.
·Until King Ra Mose II we do not have
archeological evidence that the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael), were called or known by that name.
·The first and only archeological evidence from Ancient
Egypt that potentially refers to the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) under that name
comes from the reign of the successor of King Ra Mose II. It is the Merneptah
Stele. King Merneptah was the successor of Ra Mose II in the Nineteenth
Dynasty. He reigned from 1213 to 1203 BC. He followed the West Asian groups
including potentially the
Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) to the land of Canaan to remove the seeds of the
threat.
·The Triumphal Relief of
Shoshenq I (c. 943-922 BC) of the Twenty-second Dynasty refers to the names of
thirteen groups and locations in the land of Canaan that were conquered by King
Shoshenq I. This list does not mention the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) or Ysrỉꜣr, which has few significant
indications:
oThe land of Canaan still
had the same political landscape characterized by city-states or tribe-states
with no central or federal authority.
oThere was no group
called the Israelites
(B'nei Yisrael) or Ysrỉꜣr on the Canaan land during that time. (The time of Shoshenq I c. 943-922
BC).
oDespite that some of the names
mentioned on the Triumphal Relief of Shoshenq I have similarities with some of
the names of some of the locations and tribes mentioned in the bible that does
not confirm that these groups are the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael). They are Canaanite tribes and
city-states.
oThe Israelites (B'nei Yisrael) or Ysrỉꜣr tribe-state probably lasted for a
short time during King Merneptah's reign c. 1213 to 1203 BC, and then it was
conquered and disappeared from any archeological evidence.
oThe Triumphal Relief of
Shoshenq I does not mention any Solomon's temple or David`s city despite that
it does mention many other locations on that relatively small piece of land.
There was an Ancient
Egyptian King named or entitled Phar aoh.
There was a West Asian
King who controlled parts of Northern Ancient Egypt toward the end of the 14th
dynasty. His name was Phao Ra.
There is no consensus on
the chronology of the biblical events. Some scholars suggested 1391–1271 BC;
others suggestions mentioned 1592 BC, or 1571 BC as Mose`s birth year.
The story of King Phao
Ra and Dedu- Mose/Msw/Messu happened during the 14th-16th
Dynasties. c. 1650-1582 BC.
The Exodus biblical
story refers to the Israelites' enslavement and the Ten Plagues.
King Phao Ra likely
started a campaign of oppression against his old political allies and new
opponents the Israelites (B'nei Yisrael).
There were likely
famines and plagues towards the end of the 13th and 14th
dynasties in Ancient Egypt.
The Exodus biblical
story refers to the departure of the Israelites from Ancient Egypt during the
Pharoah's reign.
There was no departure
for the West Asian groups including potentially the Israelites during King
Phao Ra`s reign. It is likely that Dedu-Mose I and his followers achieved
some victories over Phao Ra and lived in some parts of Ancient Egypt simultaneously
with the Hyksos.
Some suggest that King
Ramesses II was the Pharoah of the
Exodus.
His name was Ra Mose II.
Historical and archeological evidence does not support this hypothesis. King
Ra Mose II might have expelled some West Asian groups that were considered a
threat to national security, but this is not to be confused with the events
that happened c. 350 years earlier during the reign of King Phao Ra.
Mohammad Hasan Algarhy introduced the
"IN" sign as a new mathematical symbol. The "IN" sign was
first introduced in his book "Quantizing Emotions - The Basic Mathematics
of Psychology" which was published in February 2021.
Quantizing Emotions - The Basic
Mathematics of Psychology: Here
The Big Defreeze of the Universe -
Analogies and Thought Experiments: Here
Mohammad Hasan Algarhy, "Reconstructing the Chronology of Egyptian Predynastic Kings: A Multi - Approach Analysis", International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 12 Issue 8, August 2023, pp. 1466-1473, https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR23816103657
The depictions from 1-6 were based on Herodotus`s
description of Hawara Labyrinth, where I copied and pasted parts of his descriptions
as prompts.
Depictions from 7-10 were based on the prompts
mentioned below.
Depiction 1:
Depiction 2:
Depiction 3:
Depiction 4:
Depiction 5:
Depiction 6:
Depiction 7: Prompt: Ten floors (please show them) ancient Egyptian temple with
beautiful inscriptions.
(This prompt is based on what Louis de Cordier mentioned about the results of the advanced satellite scans led by his partner Andrew Barker, which showed huge multi-level structures 20, 40, & 80 meters deep). Starting from minute 52:00 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYoW_5yJRsE
Depiction 8: Prompt: 80 meters high ancient Egyptian building with beautiful
carvings (show the height).
The prompt had the same basis of depiction #4.
Depiction 9: Prompt: Show the layout of an ancient Egyptian huge building with
many rooms and beautiful carvings.
Depiction 10: Prompt: Show beautiful stunning corridors and rooms of a 20-meter-high ancient Egyptian office building with beautiful carvings on the walls and
the roof (show them), and show the height.
