The straight-line analogy from my book "The Big Defreeze of the Universe - Analogies & Thought Experiments"
So, the analogy goes what if the multiverse, the landscape
of string theory, and all the information within it have a one-dimensional
representation of reality as well? If you consider the two-dimensional data and
the three-dimensional data as two versions of reality or two reconstructions of
the same reality. Then why do not we have a third version or in other words, a
third reconstruction of reality in one dimension represented in a straight
line?
The logic would be the same as compressing three-dimensional
data down to a two-dimensional surface, we will consider compressing
two-dimensional data down to one dimension. It is highly likely as well that in
the process the data would be even further scrambled beyond recognition. Unless
you know the detailed code. The code is embedded/scrambled in just one
dimension, one straight line.
In the case of the two-dimensional holographic film. It is
required to shine a light on it to form a three-dimensional image? It could be
as well the same logic to form two-dimensional construction from a one-dimensional
construction.
This light could be literally light waves/photons, it could
be in a form of fluctuations/ripples or it could be in form of a force that
could be added to our current known four forces. It could be as well one of the
“imaginary complex forces” introduced in this book.
The holographic principle tells us that the maximum amount
of information in a region of space is proportional to the area of the region.
What if we want to know the maximum amount of information scrambled in a one-dimensional
straight line. It would probably be proportional to its length.
https://www.sciencealert.com/we-probably-didn-t-see-light-from-the-first-stars-after-all
ReplyDeletehttps://www.sciencealert.com/we-probably-didn-t-see-light-from-the-first-stars-after-all
ReplyDeletehttps://www.sciencealert.com/we-probably-didn-t-see-light-from-the-first-stars-after-all
ReplyDelete